It essentially gives the child a choice about how to act and what kinds of ramifications are in store if he or she fails to engage in the desired behaviors.įor example, a child with autism may be to told to pick up his or her toys after a play session. Negative reinforcement, however, focuses more on encouraging good behavior. They can provide a point of reference for children to understand what kind of behavior is expected of them and what kind of behavior will not be tolerated either at home, at school or in public. Reinforcement & Punishment: Similarities and Differencesīoth reinforcement and punishment can be effective tools to guide the behavior of children with autism. Children with autism learn to repeat good behaviors to eliminate negative reinforcement and receive more praise and reward. It also rewards good behaviors with the diminishing of negative reinforcement if or when good behaviors are demonstrated. It proves to be effective, in part, because it does not utilize the use of physical or corporal punishment. It can also be used to teach children with autism how to function at a higher level and become more independent. When used to modify the behavior of children with autism, negative reinforcement can be an effective tool to eliminate problem behaviors like screaming, tantrums, throwing and violence. However, it focuses on the use of reinforcement to encourage the desired behaviors in children. Operant conditioning actually involves both positive and negative reinforcement. The basis of this type of behavior modification originates as early as the 1930s when the learning concept of operant conditioning was created. If anything, it encourages and reinforces good behavior if it is used properly and consistently. Despite the word “negative” being attached to this form of reinforcement of good behavior, there is nothing negative or adverse about this type of behavior modification.
0 kommentar(er)
